AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
2015 best wireless router1/14/2024 ![]() Has it been carrier class when it comes to reliability? That is really up to the users to decide and based on the feedback we have received in posts like these, also on our forum and with product returns, I would say yes.Īs for BGP, we have all sorts of customers implementing with the ER PRO. carrier class reliability is what we state (as you can see above, many customers recommending them from personal experience), etc.Yes.ĭoes it have every bell and whistle? No.However, it has enough for many, many applications (including carrier use). Is this router for everyone? Of course not.Is this router exceptionally fast (has beaten routers in the several thousand dollar range), solid - i.e. In the meantime, let's call a spade a spade.Īppreciate the response. ![]() I do however wish Ubiquiti success in the face of its challenges. Ubiquiti will continue to struggle earning credibility with seasoned enterprise network professionals until they launch enterprise grade gear, which may be what you've alluded to. I come from the enterprise and carrier network industry, and know that it's not easy to break into the market. In Ubiquiti's defense, I must give credit to the groundswell of acceptance for the Unify product line, and trying to break into a market that has gone from a couple dozen major players down to less than 10 in the last 5 years. Also, Ubiquiti hasn't been around long enough to be considered truly established - maybe if the above wrongs (among other inflated claims) are righted, in 4 or 5 years Ubiquiti will have earned a good reputation. Another issue: if your ambition is to sell routers to a carriers, you must do BGP, which is not even possible in EdgeOS.īased on such facts, I cannot endorsed Ubiquiti until the product line is represented for what it is: entry level small business class equipment. Static, RIP and OSPF are borderline minimal fundamental enterprise environment routing protocols. The Edgerouter line is not in carrier class league, where redundancy, scalability and a variety of interfaces (not just Ethernet, but also V.35, ATM, HSSI, DS3, etc.) are minimum requirements just to be evaluated by network engineering. Specifically, they are being marketed as "Carrier Routing" devices with performance claims based on non-filtered forwarding rates of 64 byte packets. I am not impressed by the marketing of the Edgerouter line, where you can't take the performance claims verbatim without the grain of salt from the fine print. I'm the guy that has to support the stuff. When you used the product, what were the issues? Look forward to the feedback as we are quickly expanding this product line and continually enhancing wizards, GUI, etc.Interested in hearing what was missing for you. Interested in the feedback as to why the edgeRouter definitely should be avoided? While it is fairly new (been shipping for close to 2 years now), we have had great feedback on the product both here (see above those that have recommended) and elsewhere. It may be adequate for your wireless AP needs, but definitely to be avoided for routers. Ubiquiti is a somewhat established newcomer, and a small fish in the sea of major players.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |